The Prodigal Son, is among the most recognized parables in the New Testament, ( Luke 15:1-3,11b-32). While there are several important themes for us to consider in the reading, perhaps the most prevalent focuses on the father and the so-called “faithful son.” Paradoxically, the prodigal son is a secondary character in the story with regard to Jesus’ purpose in its telling.
The father characterized in the story represents
an individual whose unconditional love seems to exceed the “normal” bounds of
human ability and understanding. It’s hard to imagine a typical father or human being for
that matter, who is capable of acting with such selfless compassion.
On the other hand, the reaction and
behavior of the elder brother, who remains behind and steadfastly adheres to
his father’s will in performing his day to day chores, seems all too human in
his reaction to the father’s behavior. He
finds that he cannot or is unwilling to rejoice in the return of his wayward brother.
In this
story Jesus reveals that the love of God surpasses
all understanding and exists in a dimension beyond anything known to man.
That love is evidenced in the scene in which the father rushes out to greet the
Prodigal without and does not inquire into the son's derelict behavior or his intention to
repent. The father merely rejoices
in his return and in his honor, orders a feast celebrating his homecoming.
But the elder son, who professes to be
more worthy of the father’s love is angry and resentful. After all wasn’t he the more faithful and dutiful son who quietly without fanfare went about his
father’s business day in and day out?
So, to whom do we relate…the father; the
elder son, or the Prodigal? What do you think the reaction of the community to the
father’s behavior would be?
"Almost all religions and cultures believe that sin and evil are to be punished and that retribution is to be demanded of the sinner in this world—and usually the next world, too. Such retributive justice is a dualistic system of reward and punishment, good guys and bad guys, and makes perfect sense to the ego…Mere counting and ledger-keeping is not the way of the God. Our best self wants to restore relationships, and not just blame or punish. The trouble is that we have defined God as ‘punisher in chief’ instead of Healer, Forgiver, and Reconciler and so the retribution model was legitimized down through the ages…On the other hand, the aim of restorative justice is to return the person to a useful position in the community. Thus, there can be healing on both sides. Such justice is a mystery that only makes sense to the soul…and yet the term restorative justice has only entered our vocabulary recently. How can we deny that there is an evolution of consciousness, even consciousness of where the Gospel is leading us?” (Richard Rohr, Restorative Justice, Center for Action and Contemplation. 6/12/18)
No comments:
Post a Comment